Page 36 - locotrip-001
P. 36

locotrip 35

         it as a gap between the physical in sight, no ‘home’ to return to,
         world, in which everything ex- but instead a hope, an appeal
         ists,  and  the  way  we  actually for  a  successful  human  exis-
         shaping our lives. Sharli A Pa- tence  which  includes  all  the
         phitis puts it this way: ‘There is possibilities  of  things  going
         a gap for us between our vul- wrong.  This  is  where  human
         nerability to the chance and ne- freedom counts as crucial: we
         cessity of the situations in which have the means of our success-
         we find ourselves and the pos- ful living in our own hand, and
         sibilities of how we may try to we can use skills, the lead of
         realise our lives. It is precisely emotions,1 a sharpened sense
         because of this gap that we can of reality and cognition to make
         talk  about  human  agency  at the world our own domain to the
         all.’1  And  this  is  how  Jaeggi extend  it  allows  us  to  do  so.
         phrases                         it:  Often, this ‘allowance’ is rather
         ‘The possibility of appropriating limited. To appropriate does not
         something  refers,  on  the  one mean to ‘make something en-
         hand,  to  a  subject’s  power  to tirely my own’, to put a ‘stamp’
         act and form and to impose its over something I claim to pos-
         own  meaningful  mark  on  the sess control over. However, this
         world  it  appropriates.  On  the kind  of  transformation  –  from
         other hand, a process of appro- something that is not my own
         priation  is  always  bound  to  a into something that is – is al-
         given, previously existing con- ways  only  a  partly  one.  The
         tent and thereby also to an in- power of controlling all life cir-
         dependent meaning. Skills that cumstances is not granted to us
         we appropriate are constrained and we better acknowledge it. I
         by success conditions; leading can appropriate parts of what I
         our own life depends on circum- understand in an act of under-
         stances over which we do not standing but I should abandon
         have complete command.Rahel the  illusion  that  I  can  under-
         Jaeggi focusses on the how of stand  everything.  This  is  why
         re-appropriation,  where  alien- acceptance  of  the  opaque
         ation is an open-end project. No parts, in my view, is a crucial
         harmony is to be achieved, no precondition  for  better  under-
         closed end or a happy end in       standing and therefore, re-ap
   31   32   33   34   35   36   37   38   39   40   41